I saw on Daring Fireball today that John Gruber didn’t know, to my surprise, that David Pogue isn’t an employee of The New York Times.
I only knew about Pogue’s status because of an interview I heard two years ago, when Leo Laporte had him on This Week in Tech. I should probably listen to it again, but I’d be forced to count how many times Pogue says, “dude.” It was interesting to listen to, especially as Pogue pointed out repeatedly and defensively that he’s not a “journalist.” He’s a columnist. I can say he was defensive, I’m a blogger.
What Pogue calls himself means nothing to me. But I’d still appreciate it if he revealed his conflicts of interest when he’s reviewing a product. For The New York Times !
Pogue makes money writing books about Apple software. He builds a bigger name for himself by getting exclusive access to unreleased Apple products, along with other non-journalists like Walt Mossberg. If he starts slamming Apple products or grading them on a tougher curve he can kiss his access to Steve Jobs goodbye. In the interview he more or less admits he’s not going to ask the tough questions because he’ll lose access. And because it’s not his job. (He’s not a journalist.)
Daring Fireball linked to a July 6 post (that I missed) by the New York Times readers’ representative declaring that Pogue’s appearances as a representative of the publication will be curbed.
Arthur S. Brisbane: “…my inquiry into it has led to a Times internal review and, as a consequence, Pogue is barred from making any more speeches like this one to public relations professionals.”
I don’t expect much to come of this. Pogue is an extremely popular piece of New York Times content. Personally, I find his videos over the top and not as funny or informative as his commenters find them. Fans jumped to his defense in the July 6 comment thread, with excuses similar to those Pogue made on Leo’s show. Which was that essentially all tech reporters are cozy with the tech companies. If Mossberg can collect big paydays for speaking why shouldn’t Pogue?
We all know there will always be certain reporters who get special access. According to the NYTPicker piece on the subject Pogue actually claims he’s pushed the New York Times to reveal his other endeavors, but failed.
The average New York Times reader and iPad buyer could care less about any of this. Granted, Pogue isn’t the only one up to these kinds of shenanigans. But he’s high-profile and with that comes the heat. Am I turning to Pogue for truth in technology reporting? No way. I read him from time to time – but only so I know what everyone else is reading.
Leo Laporte’s interview with Pogue, from the TWiT network. 1:39:20h into the show.
David Pogue’s disclosure, undated, at the New York Times: A Note About Ethics and Disclosure. You have to click through to his profile to find it, it’s not listed within his columns.
Apple is set to report earnings for the third quarter on July 19. Longs hope the release will start the run toward $450. Expect Philip Elmer-DeWitt to keep us busy between now and then with predictions about Andy Zaky’s predictions. And expect Scott Moritz to twist every scrap of news into Apple’s doom.
Also of interest, I hadn’t seen or heard anything about this iPhone-formatted page for Apple Investors. Try http://apple.com/investor on your iPhone. How long has that been around?
I was surprised to see the announcement today that Apple is charging for FaceTime on the Mac. iChat has always been part of the OS. And in a way, so is FaceTime as it’s included with the new MacBooks announced today.
So why charge?
The only logical explanation I see is an App Store try-out for Mac users. There have to be plenty of Mac users who don’t own iOS devices. Admittedly I have no idea how many, but a significant number. Many of these users have probably never tried the App Store and Apple wants them to experience it – thinking it will lead to additional sales.
Those who own iOS devices may not have tried the Mac App Store yet either. I know I haven’t bought anything. In fact, I think I opened it once to take a look, and that was it.
I suppose they could have added it to the App Store and made it free. Or is this some kind of Sarbanes Oxley thing?? Who knows?
Rumors have been circulating: The new 64-bit iLife ’11 will ship with a “Mystery App” – and without iDVD. Could these two rumored details be related?
Here’s what I expect: An iLife application for creating rich iPad “MediaBooks” – virtual photobook presentations you swipe your way through. A page contains some combination of photos, videos, maps, and text. Music tracks are assigned to a range of pages. The layout might be very similar to the books you create and purchase as printed copies through iPhoto. But they’re multimedia, instant and free. Click the photo above for an ultracrude-mockup.
The format would replace what many people would have done with iDVD. Until now, iDVD has been the way to distribute and present (minimally) interactive content. But DVD menus aren’t the most inviting interface. Given a choice between navigating a DVD or flicking through pages on an iPad which do you think Steve Jobs would pick?
The flipbook model better reflects Apple’s direction. Does Jobs want you gathering people around the TV to watch a DVD, or would he prefer passing an iPad around – immersing people in a mediabook of your summer? The same gestures used in the iPad’s native photo app are a crowd-pleaser – pinching and expanding a virtual pile of photos. Expand a video to play full screen. View included maps in the Maps application. It’s an application that sells iPads.
Throw in some slick page turn animations and the people still using iDVD will forget about it. Best of all – it’s a reason for iPad-owning Windows users to consider a Mac.
Tom Merritt and Windows expert Paul Thurrott were talking on Windows Weekly about the last time MSFT split. Paul Thurrott said it’s split “at least once in the last twelve months.” Actually, the last split was February, 2003.
From the July 30 episode of Windows Weekly:
Tom Merritt: When’s the last time they (MSFT) split?
“Actually they do split the stock fairly regularly. In fact, I want to say they’ve done it at least once in the last twelve months. They are pretty good about that kind of stuff……And I think that, you know, I think they have to be, just to retain whatever investors they have and so forth. But yeah, the stock price is not a strength of Microsoft.”
I love listening to Thurrott’s show. He won’t let you bash Microsoft but it’s ok if he does. He likes Apple products but has a tough time admitting it. The regular host, Leo Laporte, often brings up Apple and you can feel Paul’s frustration build. If you haven’t listened to any of Leo Laporte’s podcasts you should. He gets great guests and doesn’t let discussions run off the rails.